Rural and Urban Language Variation in Balikpapan City: A Sociolinguistic Review

Variasi Bahasa Rural dan Urban di Kota Balikpapan: Tinjauan Sosiolinguistik

Authors

  • Shabrina Shafaa Riawan Universitas Balikpapan
  • Wahyu Akbar Nusantoro Wahyu Universitas Balikpapan
  • Sitti Rahmah Universitas Balikpapan
  • Maulia Universitas Balikpapan
  • Rika Istianingrum Universitas Balikpapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36709/pesastra.v3i3.138

Keywords:

language variation, rural language, urban language, sociolinguistics, Balikpapan

Abstract

This study is motivated by differences in language practices between coastal communities that maintain regional languages and urban student communities that are more open to informal Indonesian, slang, and digital media influence. This research aims to describe rural language variation at Kampung Baru Harbor and urban language variation among students of Universitas Balikpapan, as well as to explain the social factors shaping their differences. This study uses a descriptive qualitative design with a sociolinguistic approach. The data were obtained from natural speech events in two research locations and collected through non-participant observation, listening and note-taking techniques, and documentation of the social context of speech. The analysis was conducted through data reduction, categorization, thematic presentation, and conclusion drawing based on language choice, vocabulary, prosody, code-mixing, communication style, and identity function. The findings show that the rural community uses Bugis as a marker of ethnic solidarity with a direct, loud, fast, and efficient speech style.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agha, A. (2003). The social life of cultural value. Language & Communication, 23(3–4), 231–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00012-0

Androutsopoulos, J. (2006). Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(4), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00286.x

Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913489198

Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Balikpapan [Balikpapan City Statistics Agency]. (2026). Kota Balikpapan dalam angka 2026 [Balikpapan City in figures 2026]. BPS Kota Balikpapan. (In Indonesian)

Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407

Cheshire, J., Kerswill, P., Fox, S., & Torgersen, E. (2011). Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(2), 151–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00478.x

Coupland, N. (2001). Dialect stylization in radio talk. Language in Society, 30(3), 345–375. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501003013

Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x

Fishman, J. A. (1965). Who speaks what language to whom and when? La Linguistique, 1(2), 67–88.

Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.

Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Johnstone, B. (2016). Enregisterment: How linguistic items become linked with ways of speaking. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(11), 632–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12210

Labov, W. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. WORD, 19(3), 273–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799

Labov, W. (1972). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society, 1(1), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006576

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1985). Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics, 21(2), 339–384.

Poplack, S. (1980). Sometimes I'll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en español: Toward a typology of code-switching. Linguistics, 18(7–8), 581–618. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1980.18.7-8.581

Tagliamonte, S. A., & Denis, D. (2008). Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech, 83(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2008-001

Trudgill, P. (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1(2), 179–195.

Woolard, K. A., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415

Downloads

Published

2026-08-01

How to Cite

Shabrina Shafaa Riawan, Wahyu, W. A. N., Sitti Rahmah, Maulia, & Rika Istianingrum. (2026). Rural and Urban Language Variation in Balikpapan City: A Sociolinguistic Review: Variasi Bahasa Rural dan Urban di Kota Balikpapan: Tinjauan Sosiolinguistik. Jurnal Pesastra (Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra), 3(3), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.36709/pesastra.v3i3.138